how a workflow becomes a macro
Three products, three shapes, one sequence. lens sees the work. patterns finds what repeats. blueprint ranks what to build first, and where a person still signs off. Each step builds on the last, so the roadmap traces back to real work.
macro lens: see how work moves
Start with the square. lens connects to the software your teams already use, including email, Slack, CRM, support and project-management platforms. It builds one view of how information, decisions and tasks move between people, departments and systems. The sales rep's forward, legal's redline and finance's account entry stop being three separate stories and become one line across the company.
what it does- maps cross-functional handoffs and dependencies
- follows work across disconnected tools
- identifies bottlenecks, delays and fragmented processes
- applies configurable access, security and privacy controls
lens describes what is happening. It does not change anything yet.
what you get
- one map of how work moves, drawn from real activity
- the handoffs between teams, named and counted
- a baseline to measure every later change against
macro patterns: find what repeats
Now the triangle. patterns analyzes operational activity to find workflows that recur, even across departments, even when no one documented them. One customer request is a story. The same request, moving from sales to legal to finance through the same messages, approvals and data entry every week, is a pattern. patterns sees the whole loop and records it.
what it does- detects recurring cross-functional workflows
- reveals manual steps and repeated handoffs
- measures workflow frequency, duration and complexity
- distinguishes complete processes from isolated repetitive tasks
A task that repeats is not a workflow. patterns only counts the full loop.
what you get
- a named list of the workflows that actually repeat
- how often each one runs and how long it takes
- the manual steps inside each loop, in order
macro blueprint: know what to build first
Close the circle. blueprint takes each workflow patterns found and ranks it by potential impact, automation feasibility and implementation complexity. CIOs and chief AI officers get an evidence-backed roadmap: which agents to build first, what each touches, and where a person still signs off. For example: an agent drafts the contract from CRM data, and legal approves the terms.
what it does- estimates potential time and cost savings
- compares expected efficiency improvements across workflows
- identifies the teams and systems affected
- assesses automation readiness and implementation requirements
Every recommendation comes with a checkpoint. Agents act. People approve.
what you get
- a ranked roadmap of agents to build, with reasons
- the recommended agent capabilities for each workflow
- the human checkpoint each agent must keep
connects to what you already run
macro reads from the systems where work already happens. Nothing to migrate, nothing to re-enter, no new tool for your teams to learn.
- slack and chat
- crm
- support desk
- project management
configurable access, from day one
macro lens keeps configurable access, security and privacy controls. You decide which tools connect, which teams are in scope, and who inside your company can see what the map shows. The goal is a picture of how work moves between teams, not a record of what any one person did on a Tuesday.
- configurable access: you choose which tools and teams connect
- privacy controls set before the first connection
- security controls on every connected source, matched to your policy
- scope by department: start with one team, add the rest later
questions, answered
does macro replace our existing tools?
No. macro connects to the tools your teams already use and reads how work moves between them. Nobody switches tools and nothing migrates.
what do lens, patterns and blueprint each do?
lens shows how work moves. patterns finds the workflows that repeat. blueprint ranks them and says which agents to build first, with the human checkpoints each one keeps.
how long before we see results?
It depends on how often your workflows run. macro needs enough runs of a workflow to tell a pattern from a coincidence, and we confirm the window with you.
what does blueprint rank on?
Potential impact, automation feasibility and implementation complexity. Each recommendation names the agent's capabilities, the teams and systems it touches, and where a person signs off.
is macro watching our employees?
macro looks for workflows, not people. You set the access, security and privacy controls before anything connects, and you decide which teams are in scope.
who is macro for?
CIOs, chief AI officers and heads of operations who have to decide where AI goes first and want evidence behind the decision.
see your workflows the way macro does
Connect your tools, let lens learn, and see what repeats before you commit a budget to it.